Seasonal Analysis of the Grain Futures Market
Corn Futures Wheat Futures Oat
Futures
Soybean Futures SoyOil Futures SoyMeal Futures

The Grain Markets operate on a basis of variable supply and semi-fixed use. Though the production of these commodities has become a world operation during the last decade or two, the bulk of the supply is usually available at the time of harvest for the major producing regions. Use is fairly evenly spread throughout the year, though certain periods, such as the spring and early summer, tend to see increase grain demand for feed purposes. This sets up a unique feature in the market where price acts as a rationing device for annually produced commodities, as consumers and producers cycle through being gripped by the forces of fear and greed.

The worlds grain stocks must be rationed each year, meaning that production is an annual event (once a year), while consumption is ongoing. The market mechanism for rationing supply is price. When prices are high, consumers are discouraged from consumption to some degree and the supply will last longer. When prices are low, consumers are encouraged to use the product to a certain extent and the supply is used up. But price also acts as a stimulus for supply. When prices are high, producers are encouraged to increase production to increase profits. However, when prices are low, producers tend to decrease production since profit margins are not as great. This type of market behavior sets up a paradox, in which low prices discourage production, and high prices encourage production, but producer reactions to prices cannot occur until the following year. As such, swings in annually produced commodities, especially when supplies are currently tight, tend to be exaggerated when the grain market in question is vulnerable to crop damage.

The exaggerations of price are often referred to as building a "risk premium" into the crop. Since price will ultimately ration supply, it is only logical that when a crop is feared to be in limited supply, prices tend to rise to spread out supply. The grain markets tend to go through cycles of building risk premium and destroying risk premium as the grain market in question goes through its various stages of production. Risk premiums are built when consumers fear limited supply and producers have an economic motive to with hold supply from the market place. So during potentially tight supply times, consumers tend to pay higher prices for fear of not being able secure an adequate supply in the grain markets, while producers must be encouraged to sell at these higher prices to satisfy their profit motive, or greed.

However, as the consumers meet their current demand needs in the grain markets,  they tend to be motivated to find alternate sources of supply or will use other products in substitution (greed) while producers fear missing the higher prices and tend to open the flood gates of supply on to the world grain markets. As such, when the crop is in danger of potential damage, fear grips the consumer and greed the producer. Prices then rise as the  grain market builds the risk premium into the crop to ensure supply at a later date.

As the crop matures and supply looks more probable in the future, the producer now removes the risk premium from the market. There is fear of missing the attractive higher prices of selling their product to consumers who have now met their demand with alternate sources and supplies. Hence, as the grain markets go through their natural planting, maturating, and harvesting cycle, the risk premium is built and destroyed depending upon the forces of nature as well as the emotional forces of fear and greed.

This process of building and removing of risk premiums is key to understanding the rationality of grain markets. Because fear and greed are important in building and removing of risk premiums, the grain markets tend to move much farther than would be thought, and can stay at these emotional levels longer than most people would anticipate. It is this factor which makes the grain markets difficult to analyze since they are constantly being buoyed by this "irrational exuberance", to quote the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

These cycles of fear and greed in the grain markets are displayed in the following 20 year seasonal average grain market charts.  Each chart was constructed by ranking each individual day of each year by percentile, aligning each day with all the others, and finding an average.  The charts show the current year as the X axis (horizontal), while the Y-Axis (vertical axis) represents the percentile between the seasonal high and low.  1.0 represents the average seasonal high, while 0.0 represents the average seasonal low.  No attempt has been made to scale these charts to current prices, as they are intended to help educate the grain futures trader in what times of the year the market has a propensity to rally or break, and when seasonal highs and lows will most likely concern.  Since these charts represent the average behavior of the grain futures markets over the last two decades, most years will not follow these patterns exactly, but normal years (no droughts, wars, or major climatic conditions) should exhibit a similar behavior.  Don't follow these tendencies blindly, as they are strictly hypothetical road maps, which do take into account the many detours, that current grain futures market conditions will pose.   But, they do provide guidance to the past behavior, which may be very applicable to the current environment.

Enjoy

Corn Futures Wheat Futures Oat
Futures
Soybean Futures SoyOil Futures SoyMeal Futures
 

THE DATA CONTAINED HERE IN ARE BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE BUT CANNOT BE GUARANTEED AS TO RELIABILITY, ACCURACY, OR COMPLETENESS; AND, AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.  CFEA WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING, WHICH MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE ON THIS DATA OR THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HERE IN.

DISCLOSURE OF RISK: THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL; THEREFORE, ONLY GENUINE RISK FUNDS SHOULD BE USED. FUTURES AND OPTIONS MAY NOT BE SUITABLE INVESTMENTS FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS, AND INDIVIDUALS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION IN DECIDING WHETHER TO TRADE. OPTION TRADERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE EXERCISE OF A LONG OPTION WOULD RESULT IN A FUTURES POSITION.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. 

NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL, OR IS LIKELY TO, ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. 

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM, IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES, ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS, IN GENERAL, OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.