Seasonality of the Grain Markets

Field crops operate on an annual supply schedule and a variable demand schedule. Though the production of these commodities has become a world operation during the last ten to twenty years, the bulk of the supply is usually available at the time of harvest for the major producing regions. Demand, on the other hand, is fairly evenly spread throughout the year, though certain periods, such as the spring and early summer, tend to see increase grain demand. This sets up a unique feature in the market where price acts as a rationing device for annually produced commodities, as consumers and producers cycle through being gripped by the forces of fear and greed.

When a market has annual production, or supply is replenished once a year, this supply must be rationed or spread out over the rest of the year. The market mechanism for rationing supply is price. When prices are high, consumers are discouraged from consumption to some degree and the supply will last longer. When prices are low, consumers are encouraged to use the product to a certain extent and the supply is used up. But price also acts as a stimulus for supply. When prices are high, producers are encouraged to increase production to increase profits. However, when prices are low, producers tend to decrease production since profit margins are not as great. This type of market behavior sets up a paradox, in which low prices discourage production, and high prices encourage production, but producer reactions to prices cannot occur until the following year. As such, swings in annually produced commodities, especially when supplies are currently tight, tend to be exaggerated when the crop is vulnerable to damage.

The exaggerations of price are often referred to as building a "risk premium" into the crop. Since price will ultimately ration the supply that when a crop is feared to be in limited supply prices tend to rise to spread out supply. Annually produced commodities tend to go through cycles of building risk premium and destroying risk premium as the crop goes through its various stages of production. Risk premiums are built when consumer's fear limited supply and producers have an economic motive to with hold supply from the market place. So during potentially tight supply times, consumers tend to pay higher prices for fear of not being able secure supply, while producers must be encouraged to sell at these higher prices to satisfy their profit motive, or greed.

However, as the consumers meet their current demand needs they tend to be motivated to find alternate sources of supply or will use other products in substitution (greed) while producers fear missing the higher prices and tend to open the flood gates of supply. As such, when the crop is in danger of potential damage, fear grips the consumer and greed the producer. Prices then rise as the market place builds the risk premium into the crop to ensure supply at a later date.

The first of the destruction's of the grain crops tends to occur just prior to planting and into early planting. Either the weather for planting is too hot, too cold, too dry or too wet and the market place begins to fear that this years crops will not be planted. As such, new crop supply is no longer assured, and the price of the commodity tends to rise. The following table shows the typical national average planting months for specific grain markets (December contracts used for all except Soybeans, where the November contract was used) versus the rest of the year:

Planting

Months

Cents Gained

Rest of Year

Corn

Mar/Apr

26 1/4

-182 1/2

Oats

Apr

38 3/4

-603

Soybeans

Mar/Apr

163 1/4

-535

CBOT Wheat

Sep/Oct

74 1/2

-168 1/4

KC Wheat

Aug/Sep

145 1/2

-419 1/2

As can be clearly seen, field crops tend to rise going into planting. All of the commodities in question tend to increase in value, as the market-place begins to appreciate all that can go wrong with the coming crop. After all, nothing can grow with out first being planted, so planting must go smoothly for the crop to develop to its full potential. Hence, since this is the first step the production of grains, it is the point when the crop is the most vulnerable to damage, and hence prices tend to factor in a "risk premium" to help ensure that grain is rationed throughout the year.

The second destruction of the grain crop comes during pollination. All the grains must pollinate in order to produce the grain (seed, beans, ears, etc) that are the product which farmers are after. Pollination requires certain enviromental conditions, and extremes in temperature or precipitation can cause yield stiffling damage to the crops. Given the risk of pollination, and its far reaching impact on yields, the marketplace tends to build the "risk premium" into the price of grains ahead of pollination. The following table shows the typical national average pollination months for specific grain markets (December contracts used for all except Soybeans, where the November contract was used) versus the rest of the year:

Pollination

Months

Cents Gained

Rest of Year

Corn

Jun

89 1/2

-253

Oats

Jun

102 1/2

-666 3/4

Soybeans

Aug

93

-464 3/4

CBOT Wheat

Apr

162 3/4

-256 1/2

KC Wheat

Apr

202 1/2

-476 1/2

As can be clearly seen in the above table, Grain futures tend to rally going into pollination. However, as this milestone is crossed and supply becomes more certain, prices fall.

The final obstacle between the stages of buying seed, and selling grain is harvest. This third and final destruction of the grain crop occurs as traders, producers, and consumers worry that conditions are not hospitable for harvest and hence harvest will be delayed and yield will suffer. The following table shows the typical national average harvest months for specific grain markets (December contracts used for all except Soybeans, where the November contract was used) versus the rest of the year:

Harvest

Months

Cents Gained

Rest of Year

Corn

Oct/Nov

31 1/2

-195

Oats

Oct/Nov

24 1/4

-588 1/2

Soybeans

Oct/Nov

-40 1/2

-331 1/4

CBOT Wheat

Jul/Aug

-57 1/4

-36 1/2

KC Wheat

Jul/Aug

-49

-225

Again, it is clear that the market has historically rallied going into harvest and harvest preparation, as the marketplace increases the price to discount the likelihood of yield diminishing delays in the crop.

As the crop matures and supply looks more probable in the future, the producer now removes the risk premium from the market. There is fear of missing the attractive higher prices of selling their product to consumers who have now met their demand with alternate sources and supplies. Hence, as a crop goes through its natural planting, maturating, and harvesting cycle, the risk premium is built and destroyed depending upon the forces of nature as well as the emotional forces of fear and greed.  When the crop is vulnerable to damage, prices are strong as the price of the grains must reflect the probability of the crop being destroyed. The following table shows the monthly cummulative change in grain prices versus the non-"destruction", and clearly illustrates the fact that the marketplace builds a "risk premium" associated with the 3 destruction's of the grain crop each year:

3 Destroys

Months: Planting, Pollination, Harvest

Cents Gained

Rest of Year

Corn

Mar/Apr, Jun, Oct/Nov

147 1/4

-310 3/4

Oats

Apr, Jun, Oct/Nov

121 3/4

-686

Soybeans

Mar/Apr, Aug, Oct/Nov

215 3/4

-635

CBOT Wheat

Sep/Oct, Apr, Jul/Aug

274 1/4

-273 3/4

KW Wheat

Aug/Sep, Apr, Jul/Aug

390

-539 1/4

As is clearly seen in the data above, the building of the "risk premium" during the planting, pollination, and harvest segments of grain production clearly demonstrates the old traders adage.

Based on the natural cycle of building and removing of the risk premium, that Grainguide gives added weight to long positions during times of the year when the crop is most vulnerable to damage, while added weight is given to short positions during the rest of the year.

 

THE DATA CONTAINED HERE IN ARE BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE BUT CANNOT BE GUARANTEED AS TO RELIABILITY, ACCURACY, OR COMPLETENESS; AND, AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.  CFEA WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING, WHICH MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE ON THIS DATA OR THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HERE IN.

DISCLOSURE OF RISK: THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL; THEREFORE, ONLY GENUINE RISK FUNDS SHOULD BE USED. FUTURES AND OPTIONS MAY NOT BE SUITABLE INVESTMENTS FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS, AND INDIVIDUALS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION IN DECIDING WHETHER TO TRADE. OPTION TRADERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE EXERCISE OF A LONG OPTION WOULD RESULT IN A FUTURES POSITION.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. 

NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL, OR IS LIKELY TO, ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. 

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM, IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES, ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS, IN GENERAL, OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.