| Seasonality of the Grain Markets Field crops operate on an annual supply schedule and a variable demand
schedule. Though the production of these commodities has become a world operation during
the last ten to twenty years, the bulk of the supply is usually available at the time of
harvest for the major producing regions. Demand, on the other hand, is fairly evenly
spread throughout the year, though certain periods, such as the spring and early summer,
tend to see increase grain demand. This sets up a unique feature in the market where price
acts as a rationing device for annually produced commodities, as consumers and producers
cycle through being gripped by the forces of fear and greed.
When a market has annual production, or supply is replenished once a year, this supply
must be rationed or spread out over the rest of the year. The market mechanism for
rationing supply is price. When prices are high, consumers are discouraged from
consumption to some degree and the supply will last longer. When prices are low, consumers
are encouraged to use the product to a certain extent and the supply is used up. But price
also acts as a stimulus for supply. When prices are high, producers are encouraged to
increase production to increase profits. However, when prices are low, producers tend to
decrease production since profit margins are not as great. This type of market behavior
sets up a paradox, in which low prices discourage production, and high prices encourage
production, but producer reactions to prices cannot occur until the following year. As
such, swings in annually produced commodities, especially when supplies are currently
tight, tend to be exaggerated when the crop is vulnerable to damage.
The exaggerations of price are often referred to as building a "risk premium"
into the crop. Since price will ultimately ration the supply that when a crop is feared to
be in limited supply prices tend to rise to spread out supply. Annually produced
commodities tend to go through cycles of building risk premium and destroying risk premium
as the crop goes through its various stages of production. Risk premiums are built when
consumer's fear limited supply and producers have an economic motive to with hold supply
from the market place. So during potentially tight supply times, consumers tend to pay
higher prices for fear of not being able secure supply, while producers must be encouraged
to sell at these higher prices to satisfy their profit motive, or greed.
However, as the consumers meet their current demand needs they tend to be motivated to
find alternate sources of supply or will use other products in substitution (greed) while
producers fear missing the higher prices and tend to open the flood gates of supply. As
such, when the crop is in danger of potential damage, fear grips the consumer and greed
the producer. Prices then rise as the market place builds the risk premium into the crop
to ensure supply at a later date.
The first of the destruction's of the grain crops tends to occur just prior to planting
and into early planting. Either the weather for planting is too hot, too cold, too dry or
too wet and the market place begins to fear that this years crops will not be planted. As
such, new crop supply is no longer assured, and the price of the commodity tends to rise.
The following table shows the typical national average planting months for specific grain
markets (December contracts used for all except Soybeans, where the November contract was
used) versus the rest of the year:
| Planting |
Months |
Cents Gained |
Rest of Year |
| Corn |
Mar/Apr |
26 1/4 |
-182 1/2 |
| Oats |
Apr |
38 3/4 |
-603 |
| Soybeans |
Mar/Apr |
163 1/4 |
-535 |
| CBOT Wheat |
Sep/Oct |
74 1/2 |
-168 1/4 |
| KC Wheat |
Aug/Sep |
145 1/2 |
-419 1/2 |
As can be clearly seen, field crops tend to rise going into planting.
All of the commodities in question tend to increase in value, as the market-place begins
to appreciate all that can go wrong with the coming crop. After all, nothing can grow with
out first being planted, so planting must go smoothly for the crop to develop to its full
potential. Hence, since this is the first step the production of grains, it is the point
when the crop is the most vulnerable to damage, and hence prices tend to factor in a
"risk premium" to help ensure that grain is rationed throughout the year.
The second destruction of the grain crop comes during pollination. All the grains must
pollinate in order to produce the grain (seed, beans, ears, etc) that are the product
which farmers are after. Pollination requires certain enviromental conditions, and
extremes in temperature or precipitation can cause yield stiffling damage to the crops.
Given the risk of pollination, and its far reaching impact on yields, the marketplace
tends to build the "risk premium" into the price of grains ahead of pollination.
The following table shows the typical national average pollination months for specific
grain markets (December contracts used for all except Soybeans, where the November
contract was used) versus the rest of the year:
| Pollination |
Months |
Cents Gained |
Rest of Year |
| Corn |
Jun |
89 1/2 |
-253 |
| Oats |
Jun |
102 1/2 |
-666 3/4 |
| Soybeans |
Aug |
93 |
-464 3/4 |
| CBOT Wheat |
Apr |
162 3/4 |
-256 1/2 |
| KC Wheat |
Apr |
202 1/2 |
-476 1/2 |
As can be clearly seen in the above table, Grain futures tend to rally
going into pollination. However, as this milestone is crossed and supply becomes more
certain, prices fall.
The final obstacle between the stages of buying seed, and selling grain is harvest.
This third and final destruction of the grain crop occurs as traders, producers, and
consumers worry that conditions are not hospitable for harvest and hence harvest will be
delayed and yield will suffer. The following table shows the typical national average
harvest months for specific grain markets (December contracts used for all except
Soybeans, where the November contract was used) versus the rest of the year:
| Harvest |
Months |
Cents Gained |
Rest of Year |
| Corn |
Oct/Nov |
31 1/2 |
-195 |
| Oats |
Oct/Nov |
24 1/4 |
-588 1/2 |
| Soybeans |
Oct/Nov |
-40 1/2 |
-331 1/4 |
| CBOT Wheat |
Jul/Aug |
-57 1/4 |
-36 1/2 |
| KC Wheat |
Jul/Aug |
-49 |
-225 |
Again, it is clear that the market has historically rallied going into
harvest and harvest preparation, as the marketplace increases the price to discount the
likelihood of yield diminishing delays in the crop.
As the crop matures and supply looks more probable in the future, the producer now
removes the risk premium from the market. There is fear of missing the attractive higher
prices of selling their product to consumers who have now met their demand with alternate
sources and supplies. Hence, as a crop goes through its natural planting, maturating, and
harvesting cycle, the risk premium is built and destroyed depending upon the forces of
nature as well as the emotional forces of fear and greed. When the crop is
vulnerable to damage, prices are strong as the price of the grains must reflect the
probability of the crop being destroyed. The following table shows the monthly cummulative
change in grain prices versus the non-"destruction", and clearly illustrates the
fact that the marketplace builds a "risk premium" associated with the 3
destruction's of the grain crop each year:
| 3 Destroys |
Months:
Planting, Pollination, Harvest |
Cents Gained |
Rest of Year |
| Corn |
Mar/Apr, Jun,
Oct/Nov |
147 1/4 |
-310 3/4 |
| Oats |
Apr, Jun,
Oct/Nov |
121 3/4 |
-686 |
| Soybeans |
Mar/Apr, Aug,
Oct/Nov |
215 3/4 |
-635 |
| CBOT Wheat |
Sep/Oct, Apr,
Jul/Aug |
274 1/4 |
-273 3/4 |
| KW Wheat |
Aug/Sep, Apr,
Jul/Aug |
390 |
-539 1/4 |
As is clearly seen in the data above, the building of the "risk
premium" during the planting, pollination, and harvest segments of grain production
clearly demonstrates the old traders adage.
Based on the natural cycle of building and removing of the risk premium, that
Grainguide gives added weight to long positions during times of the year when the crop is
most vulnerable to damage, while added weight is given to short positions during the rest
of the year.
Money
Management
Fundamental
Method
Technical
Method
|
|