Home
Order
Form

Preview
Grain
Guide
Fast Facts on
Grain Futures

Futures Quotes
Weather
USDA Report
Schedule

"Old" Grain
Traders Lore

Futures Trading Terms



Links


Contact Info
About CFEA
About
Grainguide

 

 

 

"Old" Grain Futures Trading Lore #2:

Gaps Are Meant to Filled...

The following results are HYPOTHETICAL in nature and several months old!  See disclaimer at the bottom of the page.... enjoy!

Preview Almanac Order Form

Technical Analysis . . . Gaps are Meant to "Filled"

An old expression amongst traders and technical analysts is that that "Gaps are meant to be filled". Before we jump into the validity of this saying and what we can learn from examining the "Gap" we need to define both a "Gap" and "Filled".

Gap Defined

There are two basic types of "Gaps": Up Gaps and Down Gaps. An up-gap is defined as a day session price range in which today's low is greater than the previous trading sessions high. A down-gap is defined as a day session range in which the high for the current session is lower than the previous sessions low.

The Gap is defined as the range which is not filled in. For example, the Up Gap presented above was between the high of the 4th bar to the low of the 5th bar, or in this example from 390 to 392. The Down Gap presented above covers the range from the low of the 4th bar to the high of the 5th bar, or from 390 to 386.

"Filled" Defined

A Gap is considered filled when prices close the gap, or trade through the entire gap. An up gap is considered filled when prices trade at or below the low point of the "up gap". Using our example above, on day 5 the market made a gap from 390 to 392, and settled at 396 1/2. If this market were to trade at or below 390, the gap would be considered "filled". A down gap is considered "filled" when prices trade at or above the highest point of the gap, or the low on the day previous to the "gap". Using our example above, a gap occurred on day 5, from 386 to 390, and the market settled at 385. This gap would be considered filled when prices traded up to 390.

Studying Gaps

We examined the last decade of prices (1989 to 1998) to see if "Gaps are Filled" for the Corn, CBOT Wheat, and Soybean markets. For Corn and CBOT Wheat we used the July contract from December through June and the December contract from July through November. For Soybeans we used the July contract from November through June and the November contract from July through October. Only one gap for any given in each market was recorded and examined.

Over the last decade, Corn Futures have made 328 gaps, CBOT Wheat futures have gapped 201 times and the Soybean futures market has formed 295 Gaps. This data period covers roughly 2,520 trading sessions, so gaps have occurred on the charts 13% of the time for Corn, 7.9% of the time for CBOT futures and 11.7% of the time for Soybean futures. With in 10 trading days of a gap occurring, prices filled the Gap 214 times in the Corn market (65.2%), 145 times in the CBOT Wheat market (72.1%) and 199 times in the Soybean market (67.5%). Based on these figures, the old expression "Gaps are meant to be Filled" is certainly filled.

Corn Futures Gaps Examined

Of the 328 Gaps in the corn market in the last decade, 150 were Up-Gaps (gap days low is higher than the previous days high) and 178 were Down-Gaps (gap days high is lower than the previous days low). With in 10 business days, 65% of the Up-Gaps were filled and 66% of the Down-Gaps were filled. A break-down of the filling of the gaps at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 trading sessions is as follows:

Total Filled

1

2-3 days

4 -5 days

6-7 days

8-10 days

Up Gaps

97

39

33

13

8

4

Down Gaps

117

42

39

17

14

6

As you can see by examining the above table, over 60% of the Gaps are filled with in 7 days of the gap occurring on the chart., with almost half of the Gaps being filled with in 3 days of the gap occurring. The quickness in filling the gaps is most likely due to the fact that the bulk of the gaps are rather small: 237 of the gaps examined in the last decade were less than 2 cents, and only 40 were greater than 4 cents (size of the gap is defined as the distance between the two extremes of the gap (Up Gap: Low of Gap Day - High of Previous Day; Down Gap: Low of Previous Day - High of Gap Day). Based on this, it is only logical that the smaller gaps are filled faster than the larger gaps:

Gaps % Filled by Size of Gap

(in cents/bu.)

% Filled

1 day

2-3 days

4-5 days

6-7days

8-10 days

Less than -8

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

-6 to -7.75

60%

0%

40%

40%

60%

60%

-4 to -5.75

33%

0%

20%

27%

33%

33%

-2.0 to -3.75

59%

18%

27%

45%

50%

59%

0 to -1.75

71%

28%

51%

60%

68%

71%

0 to 1.75

71%

38%

57%

61%

68%

71%

2 to 3.75

67%

8%

38%

58%

63%

67%

4 to 5.75

50%

0%

33%

50%

50%

50%

6 to 7.75

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

8 to 9.75

60%

0%

40%

60%

60%

60%

10 to 11.75

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Greater than 12

100%

0%

0%

100%

100%

100%

Based on the above, it is safe to say that "Gaps" in the Corn futures market tend to be filled with in 7 business, with larger gaps taking longer.

CBOT Wheat Gaps Examined

Since 1979, the CBOT Wheat market has made 201 gaps. 95 of the gaps were Up-Gaps and 106 of the gaps were Down-Gaps. 67 of the 95 Up Gaps (71%) were filled with in ten business days, and 78 of the 106 Down-Gaps (74%) were filled with in 10 business days. A break-down of the filling of the gaps at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 trading sessions is as follows:

Total Filled

1 day

2-3 days

4-5 days

6-7 days

8-10 days

Up Gaps

67

23

31

4

7

2

Down Gaps

78

32

29

9

4

5

Over half of the Gaps in the CBOT Wheat market were filled within 3 trading days, and over 60% of the Gaps were filled with in 5 trading sessions. Much like the Corn market, the bulk of the CBOT Wheat gaps were very small in size, with 160 of the 201 (79.6%) being less than 2 1/2 cents. Due to the frequency of these small gaps, it is only logical that they be filled very quickly.

Gaps % Filled by Size of Gap

In cents/bu.

% Filled

1 day

2-3 days

4-5 days

6-7 days

8-10 days

Less than -12.50

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

-10 to -12.25

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

-7.50 to -9.75

100%

0%

100%

100%

100%

100%

-5 to -7.25

50%

0%

0%

0%

50%

50%

-2.50 to -4.75

71%

14%

57%

57%

57%

71%

0 to -2.25

75%

33%

59%

67%

71%

75%

0 to 2.25

79%

29%

68%

71%

76%

79%

2.5 to 4.75

44%

6%

31%

38%

44%

44%

5 to 7.25

40%

20%

20%

20%

40%

40%

7.50 to 9.95

67%

33%

33%

33%

67%

67%

10 to 12.25

50%

0%

0%

50%

50%

50%

Greater than 12.50

100%

0%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Again, the old saying "Gaps are meant to be Filled" scored true for the CBOT Wheat market, with the speed of the closing of the gap being directly proportional to the size of the gap.

Soybean Gaps Examined

The most volatile member of the grain complex is the Soybean market, so it is only logical that it has displayed the most Gaps in the last decade. Of the 295 gaps on the Soybean charts since 1979, 199 have been filled. Soybean gaps have been fairly evenly distributed between Up-Gaps and Down-Gaps, with 144 Up-Gaps and 151 Down-Gaps. 101 of the total 144 Up-Gaps have been filled within 10 trading sessions (70%) and 98 of the 151 Down-Gaps have been filled with 10 trading sessions. A break-down of the filling of the gaps at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 trading sessions is as follows:

Total Filled

1 day

2-3 days

4-5 days

6-7 days

8-10 days

Up Gaps

101

42

31

17

7

4

Down Gaps

98

36

25

19

10

8

Like the other markets examined, the bulk of the gaps in the Soybean market are samll, with 222 of the total 295 Gaps being less than 5 cents. As such, over half of the Up-Gaps are filled within 3 business days and half of the Down-Gaps within 5 business days. Within 7 trading sessions of the gap, 63.3% of all the gaps are filled. However, the large gaps, especially to the downside do not tend to be filled with in 10 trading sessions. Only 38% of the Gaps less than -10 cents to the downside have been filled with in 10 trading sessions, while less than half of the upside gaps greater than 15 cents have been filled with in two weeks. The size of the gap is very important in the Soybean market. Below is a distribution of Gaps by size with percentage filling:

Gaps % Filled by Size of Gap

In cents/bu. % Filled

1 day

2-3 days

4-5days

6-7 days

8-10 days

Less than -25

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

-24.75 to -20

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

-19.75 to -15

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

-14.75 to -10

38%

6%

13%

13%

38%

38%

-9.75 to -5

61%

28%

11%

39%

50%

61%

-4.75 to 0

69%

37%

48%

59%

64%

69%

0 to 4.75

74%

18%

59%

69%

72%

74%

5 to 9.75

68%

8%

36%

50%

59%

68%

10 to 14.75

75%

0%

42%

67%

75%

75%

15 to 19.75

50%

0%

0%

25%

50%

50%

20 to 24.75

33%

0%

33%

33%

33%

33%

Greater than 25

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Based on the above, the old wisdom that "Gaps are meant to be Filled" hold true for the Soybean market as well, however in the event of a large Gap, don't count on it. However, Gaps greater than -12 cents to the down side have only occurred 12 times in the last decade, and upside gaps greater than 15 cents have only occurred 8 times. In the event of one of these rare occurrences, ignore the old traders saying.

Corollary to Gaps must be Filled…. Gaps predict Direction

Another frequently bandied about expression by the chartists and traders is that gaps predict direction after being filled. On the whole, this is marginally true, with Up Gaps leading to higher prices 50% of the time in the Corn market, 49.5% of the time in the CBOT Wheat market, and a scant 42.4% of the time in the Soybean futures market. However, the time of the year incorporated with the direction of the Gap can be a good indication of future direction.

Gaps tend to occur during the months with the most uncertainty. For the grains this equates to the weather markets of June, July and August.

# of Gaps by Month and Type

Corn
Up

Corn Down

Wheat
Up

Wheat Down

Soybean Up

Soybean Down

Total

150

178

95

106

144

151

Jan

13

9

9

9

9

10

Feb

6

9

2

9

6

6

Mar

8

9

8

9

7

8

Apr

11

11

14

8

12

9

May

11

17

8

10

9

11

Jun

23

23

14

13

21

24

Jul

21

33

13

13

25

28

Aug

20

17

10

10

16

16

Sep

8

14

6

7

11

12

Oct

13

13

6

8

9

10

Nov

9

15

1

8

8

7

Dec

7

8

4

2

11

10

# of Times Gaps have Correctly Predicted the
next 10 Trading Sessions direction

Corn Up

Corn Down

Wheat Up

Wheat Down

Soybean Up

Soybean Down

Total

75

94

47

55

61

73

Jan

8

5

4

4

4

6

Feb

5

3

1

4

5

1

Mar

4

6

5

4

3

4

Apr

3

6

5

6

4

3

May

6

8

2

8

1

7

Jun

12

11

4

8

7

11

Jul

7

24

9

10

8

22

Aug

13

6

7

3

11

4

Sep

3

8

4

0

3

8

Oct

7

6

1

3

5

3

Nov

4

8

1

5

6

1

Dec

3

3

4

0

4

3

Total Change over Next 10 Trading Sessions
by Month and Gap Type

Corn
Up

Corn Down

Wheat
Up

Wheat Down

Soybean Up

Soybean Down

Total

-241.75

-253

13.5

40

-800.25

-161.125

Jan

-5.25

4

-1

11.75

-53.25

0.75

Feb

21.5

14.5

9.5

10.75

10.75

59.75

Mar

34.25

-34.25

44.5

17.75

-4

-27.25

Apr

-24.75

22

95.75

-12.5

-97

59.75

May

15.75

-9

-42.75

-80.5

-133.5

-133

Jun

-54.75

-14.75

-76.75

57.75

-77.75

0.875

Jul

-241.25

-219.25

-40

-83.75

-403.5

-346.75

Aug

31

12.5

28.75

35.75

44.25

115.75

Sep

3.5

-28.5

12.25

74.5

-128

-65.25

Oct

-17

-7

-45.75

34

19.75

31.5

Nov

-13.75

-5.5

11

-39

17

82.75

Dec

9

12.25

18

12

5

60

Based on the above traders should head the following:

  • Follow Upside Gaps in the Month of February in the Corn and Soybean markets. Aggressive Traders may also wish to "fade" downside Gaps.
  • Follow Upside Gaps in the Month of March in the CBOT Wheat Market.
  • During the month of April, "fade" all Gaps in the Soybean market as Gaps have historically been exhaustive in nature.
  • As the winter Wheat matures in May, follow any downside gaps in the CBOT Wheat market during May.
  • July has historically seen more Gaps than any other month, and all the Gaps tend to offer good opportunities to establish short positions: follow downside gaps and "fade" upside gaps in July.
  • Follow upside Gaps in the Corn market in August, and "fade" downside gaps in the Soybean market.
  • Follow upside gaps in the Wheat market during November as planting premiums are built into the winter Wheat market, and "fade" downside Gaps in the Soybean market as harvest pressure is typically overdone.

The above are a few simple rules, which grain traders may wish to examine closer to see if they can be fit into your trading aresenal. If you have any suggestions for future articles, please feel free to drop an e-mail to grainmaster@grainguide.com

 Preview Almanac Order Form


THE DATA CONTAINED HERE IN ARE BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE BUT CANNOT BE GUARANTEED AS TO RELIABILITY, ACCURACY, OR COMPLETENESS; AND, AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.  CFEA WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING, WHICH MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE ON THIS DATA OR THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HERE IN.

DISCLOSURE OF RISK: THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING FUTURES AND OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL; THEREFORE, ONLY GENUINE RISK FUNDS SHOULD BE USED. FUTURES AND OPTIONS MAY NOT BE SUITABLE INVESTMENTS FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS, AND INDIVIDUALS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION IN DECIDING WHETHER TO TRADE. OPTION TRADERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE EXERCISE OF A LONG OPTION WOULD RESULT IN A FUTURES POSITION.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. 

NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL, OR IS LIKELY TO, ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. 

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM, IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES, ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS, IN GENERAL, OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.